The US Australian Alliance Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the US Australian Alliance. Answer: The alliance with the USA has been the most important plank in Australian foreign policy sincethe Second World War. Is this enduring alliance based on shared interests or tradition. The Second World War brought about various changes in the Australian government which led to the development of a mutual relationship with the US. The Australian foreign policy has been dominated by the American since the end of II World war. It has been discovered that Australia has wholly relied on the Great Britain which is the mother country for foreign policy. However, as the Australia benefits from security provision from the US, the US benefits from gaining economic advantages from Australia. After the Japanese threats and incursion which initiated a need to seek for foreign policies, from the Great Britain to the USA, the Great Britain declined to offer a defence to the Australian people during the threatening times. This necessitated the country to look for alternative ways of attaining the national and regional security for the government and the people. The USA, being the world's most influential, powerful and advanced nation came to the aid of Australia in pursuit to provide security and this caused a significant alliance. As it was thought that Australia was unable to protect itself independently, the country signed the ANZUS Treaty in order to strengthen the relationship with the US in pursuit of national security. The ANZUS was meant to be a mutual support agreement that each country would come to the aid of others in case of a civil war or attack by terrorists. The treaty was to provide the Australia with the access to the Americas highest military and political boards for long-term security provision against the Japanese threats. For the US, the alliance was meant to pawn the spread of socialism in the Pacific region and Asia since it already had a peace deal with Japan. The Australian facilities and its people were a major target in the post-9/11 environment since the country had a close alliance with the US. The transport systems were the most vulnerable areas of attacks due to the physique movement of passengers and dependence on aviation (De Prato Simon, 2015). Recommendations were made which focused on improving the aviation security by initiating enhanced security training and a system to recover the lost security in aviation. Australia and the US have various shared interests in the stability and security of the Indian Ocean which is the area of intersection although at times they may approach it differently. The presence of the US militia in the region is regarded as a significant stabilizing factor. Australia is also involved in the security provision whereby the US has encouraged it to contribute much to the security of the region. Australia has recognized its need to engage in the security provision and it has benefited a lot from the US strategic predominance in the region. While Australias biggest aim of the relationship is to attain national security and assurance of military assistance in times of war, the US focuses on gaining the economic advantage due to its powerful dominance of weapons (Pelletier, 2013). The US and Australia have often agreed on issues based on the post-cold war era. Australia agrees with the US assessment of risks and threats and also supports the America's policy responses. In establishing the Australian economy, the US has played a role in running a trade deficit with the country. Although America has done much in sustaining the export-led development of Australia, through voracious consumer-led demand, Australia has not benefited much in these developments (Koinova, 2014). Australia exports to America are products of insensitive areas and this subjects them to trade restrictions and barriers. In the pursuit to eliminate these trade barriers, the Australian government has made efforts to achieve a free trade agreement with the US as a foreign policy which comes with some positive impacts. The Australian government has majored in conveying binding, long-term agreements which will prevent the US from using the enormous powers to pursue biased bilateral deals favoring its interests. The US has pursued tacitly relating trade and security issues as a way to reward Australia due to their commitments in the war against terrorists in America. However, the effo rts seem to bear fewer fruits. The role of Australia in the war on terror in supporting the America against the Iraq, further threatened the long-standing export markets (Yu, 2016). The security relationship between the two countries has been healthy over the years with America being militarily dominant. The ANZUS ensues military ties between the two countries. Although Australias defense organizers have moved to a more resourceful defense attitude, the relationship with the US still remains significant as it provides access to defense technology and intelligence which Australia cannot reach on its own. As the country strives to own the expensive weapons which can fight large-scale conservative wars, it is seemingly important that in case of an attack, America will still have to chip in. Nonetheless, the relevance of the high-cost weapons systems such as the Joint Strike Fighter program is still in doubt as the program will place the country in an unconfirmed system which looks misplaced in the embryonic non-traditional security environment. It is casual that the US is focused to take advantage of its exploitative spot as the supplier of the advanced military te chnology to secure its commercial benefits (Al-Ekabi et al, 2015). This is because the US plans to tie the strategic and economic issues in a way which will conciliate the decision of the Australia to be independent in the provision of security. The US fears its capacity to obtain commercial benefits being challenged by this move since the defense spending will have reduced. The alliance was based on the shared interest that every country may support each other in times of war. As seen in the II world war, the US got much involved in the fight to help Australia and similarly, during the US war with the Iraq, Australia spared no efforts to help the country gain peace. Since the Second World War, the US- Australian relationship has gained an increasingly protruding position in the development of the security and economic policies in Australia. However, the relationship subjects Australia to the Americas global political priorities and policies which may necessarily not be the interests of the Australia. References Al-Ekabi, C., Baranes, B., Hulsroj, P., Lahcen, A. (Eds.). (2015).Yearbook on Space Policy 2014: The Governance of Space. Springer. Press. De Prato, G., Simon, J. P. (2015). Is data really the new oil of the 21st century or just another snake oil? Looking at uses and users (private/public). Press. Koinova, M. (2014). Diasporas and contextualized transnationalism. InPost-Yugoslavia(pp. 133-161). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Press. Lubin, F. J. L. (2014). Some Examples of Restructuring (II). InThe Executive Guide to Corporate Restructuring(pp. 115-138). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Press. McNamara, P., Harvey, A., Andrewartha, L. (2017). Passports out of poverty: Raising access to higher education for care leavers in Australia.Children and Youth Services Review. Press. O la Unin Europea, R., Prez, J. G. (2017). Nota del Coordinador del Nmero 9. Press. Pelletier, B. J. J. (2013).Internationalization of SME and entry mode choice in Brazil: the case study of Ameco, a French SME(Doctoral dissertation). Press. Sinnett, D., Calvert, T., Burgess, S ., Smith, N. (2017). Global green infrastructure: How is green infrastructure research transl ated into practice outside the UK? Press. Tiwari, A. K., Dash, A. K., Narayanan, B. G. (2017). Foreign tourist arrivals in India from major source countries: an empirical analysis.Current Issues in Tourism, 1-20. Press. Yu, P. K. (2016). The Investment-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.Am. UL Rev.,66, 829. Press.